🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold action to prohibit social media access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, campaigners, and parents are monitoring closely to see if this tactic will set a precedent for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of states are exploring comparable measures.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader stating that phones and networks are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". The policy is expected to be passed soon.
• The Norwegian government is set to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to verify the identity and age of social media users. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban remains "a potential options in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on the legislature to enact a law increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a comparable move, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Dutch government has recommended parents to block their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a non-binding motion supporting a ban for minors unless parental consent is given. Even though it highlights of the "addictive" design of these platforms, the step does not create binding law.

"A clear age barrier is a good starting point," said the parliamentarian driving the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is being dismissed" but stressing any action must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Earlier, support gathered behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end watered down. Nonetheless, the administration committed to conduct more studies the matter.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after encountering disturbing platform posts contends that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design platforms and apps that are safe and fit for children," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, regulation is largely unfolding at the local level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• The state of Utah requires guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has signed a law barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further access requiring parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted laws requiring adult authorization for under-16s to create social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and calls from some figures to mimic this lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Outlook

Outside of the West, additional states are also considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, international bodies adopt a more measured tone. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could backfire". The body notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated young people and that government action should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

As this worldwide discussion evolves, the policies of this nation and others show that policymakers internationally are less and less willing to wait for platforms to act voluntarily.